<div id='error'>
			<p class='wpdberror'><strong>WordPress database error:</strong> [Duplicate entry '141344' for key 1]<br />
			<code>INSERT INTO wp_bas_visitors (visit_ip, referer, osystem, useragent,	lasthere) VALUES (644300600, 1, 660, 4339, '2008-12-03 20:27:26');</code></p>
			</div><div id='error'>
			<p class='wpdberror'><strong>WordPress database error:</strong> [You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'AND referer = referer_id AND osystem = os_id AND useragent = ua_]<br />
			<code>SELECT * FROM wp_bas_visitors, wp_bas_refer, wp_bas_ua, wp_bas_os WHERE visit_id =  AND referer = referer_id AND osystem = os_id AND useragent = ua_id</code></p>
			</div><div id='error'>
			<p class='wpdberror'><strong>WordPress database error:</strong> [You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ' '2008-12-03 20:27:26', 0, 4458)' at line 1]<br />
			<code>INSERT INTO wp_bas_log (visit, stamp, outbound, page) VALUES (, '2008-12-03 20:27:26', 0, 4458);</code></p>
			</div><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congratulations Barry Bonds</title>
	<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/wenBLOG/2007/08/08/congratulations-barry-bonds/</link>
	<description>...what I think and why</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Eric</title>
		<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/wenBLOG/2007/08/08/congratulations-barry-bonds/#comment-3988</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wendellrobinson.com/wenBLOG/2007/08/08/congratulations-barry-bonds/#comment-3988</guid>
					<description>understand your point and appreciate it.  it's tough.  my point really is that we don't seem to like even the &quot;perception&quot; of having cheated to get where you are, hence the natives being restless.

i think everyone and your brother would LOVE to go nuts about this record being broken but can't.  aside from those in 'frisco who obviously have the &quot;yeah, but he's OUR steroid using bum!&quot; mentality.  we see that alot in congress as well, right?

i just hate that it's not a tiger woods type breaking a record.  now there's an agent's dream.

you can argue the letter of the law 'til the cows come home, but it won't change the public perception and i think the public has this one about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>understand your point and appreciate it.  it&#8217;s tough.  my point really is that we don&#8217;t seem to like even the &#8220;perception&#8221; of having cheated to get where you are, hence the natives being restless.</p>
<p>i think everyone and your brother would LOVE to go nuts about this record being broken but can&#8217;t.  aside from those in &#8216;frisco who obviously have the &#8220;yeah, but he&#8217;s OUR steroid using bum!&#8221; mentality.  we see that alot in congress as well, right?</p>
<p>i just hate that it&#8217;s not a tiger woods type breaking a record.  now there&#8217;s an agent&#8217;s dream.</p>
<p>you can argue the letter of the law &#8217;til the cows come home, but it won&#8217;t change the public perception and i think the public has this one about right.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wendell</title>
		<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/wenBLOG/2007/08/08/congratulations-barry-bonds/#comment-3967</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wendellrobinson.com/wenBLOG/2007/08/08/congratulations-barry-bonds/#comment-3967</guid>
					<description>The question I have Eric is if it wasn't cheating at the time how can we look back in retrospect and call it cheating now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question I have Eric is if it wasn&#8217;t cheating at the time how can we look back in retrospect and call it cheating now?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric</title>
		<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/wenBLOG/2007/08/08/congratulations-barry-bonds/#comment-3952</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wendellrobinson.com/wenBLOG/2007/08/08/congratulations-barry-bonds/#comment-3952</guid>
					<description>Bonds gets the treatment he does because most Americans don't like cheaters.  That's a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonds gets the treatment he does because most Americans don&#8217;t like cheaters.  That&#8217;s a good thing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.390 seconds -->
