<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New GOP Straw Poll</title>
	<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/</link>
	<description>What I Think And Why</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mike</title>
		<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/#comment-771</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/#comment-771</guid>
					<description>no question about your last point.  can you imagine being a local democrat for the past 40 years and realize that your party has left you?  what would you do?  would you walk into the enemy camp and admit to 25 years of having been wrong and throwing better candidates to the wolves in the name of partisan politics based on an ideology that is completely reversed from the one that caused you to sign on originally 40 years ago?  a tough nut to crack to be certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no question about your last point.  can you imagine being a local democrat for the past 40 years and realize that your party has left you?  what would you do?  would you walk into the enemy camp and admit to 25 years of having been wrong and throwing better candidates to the wolves in the name of partisan politics based on an ideology that is completely reversed from the one that caused you to sign on originally 40 years ago?  a tough nut to crack to be certain.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TimFerris</title>
		<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/#comment-744</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/#comment-744</guid>
					<description>That certainly is a nasty rumor; it's a good thing we don't take things personally--we'd have to go out and rent a plane to counteract it. 

First of all, there were too many &quot;principals&quot; involved--16 people, by my count--to allow any deal cutting. We had checks and balances, and all was done by consensus. It was a pretty good process, and I'm looking forward to continuing to work with this group--they were exceptional. The decision not to submit was an all-cards-on-the-table group decision.

Second, if we had had the requisite number, we would have submitted to a count just because of the power of 46,000 in less than 30 days to definitively &quot;punk&quot; the two commissioners, the Lesic progaganda shop, the sorely compromised PD, and that nebulous thing called the GCP. Although we did &quot;punk&quot; them pretty well, it was a nebulous punking, not the definitive punking we strove for. We still hear them squealing and trying to re-create reality, like over at that medicalmart/ShotInTheShorts site, for instance; they know they lost on every count but the number of signatures, and they're trying to reassure themselves they've vanquished the voices and the vote. 

But, we're certainly not done, and thanks for keeping an eye on this for all of us. We had a lot of fun making them commit assets--a lot of time and money--to doing dishonest things. Now, we showcase the after-action reports, and let the public decide for themselves where this goes next. We're entering a new era, that Third Wave thing. Some shift sooner. Some can't because they have entrenched interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That certainly is a nasty rumor; it&#8217;s a good thing we don&#8217;t take things personally&#8211;we&#8217;d have to go out and rent a plane to counteract it. </p>
<p>First of all, there were too many &#8220;principals&#8221; involved&#8211;16 people, by my count&#8211;to allow any deal cutting. We had checks and balances, and all was done by consensus. It was a pretty good process, and I&#8217;m looking forward to continuing to work with this group&#8211;they were exceptional. The decision not to submit was an all-cards-on-the-table group decision.</p>
<p>Second, if we had had the requisite number, we would have submitted to a count just because of the power of 46,000 in less than 30 days to definitively &#8220;punk&#8221; the two commissioners, the Lesic progaganda shop, the sorely compromised PD, and that nebulous thing called the GCP. Although we did &#8220;punk&#8221; them pretty well, it was a nebulous punking, not the definitive punking we strove for. We still hear them squealing and trying to re-create reality, like over at that medicalmart/ShotInTheShorts site, for instance; they know they lost on every count but the number of signatures, and they&#8217;re trying to reassure themselves they&#8217;ve vanquished the voices and the vote. </p>
<p>But, we&#8217;re certainly not done, and thanks for keeping an eye on this for all of us. We had a lot of fun making them commit assets&#8211;a lot of time and money&#8211;to doing dishonest things. Now, we showcase the after-action reports, and let the public decide for themselves where this goes next. We&#8217;re entering a new era, that Third Wave thing. Some shift sooner. Some can&#8217;t because they have entrenched interests.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wendell</title>
		<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/#comment-739</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/#comment-739</guid>
					<description>Thanks Mike for the info - I can tell you that it is patently false.  I'll pass it on to the folks in the know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike for the info - I can tell you that it is patently false.  I&#8217;ll pass it on to the folks in the know.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mike</title>
		<link>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/#comment-738</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wendellrobinson.com/blog2/2007/08/29/new-gop-straw-poll-2/#comment-738</guid>
					<description>wendell,
     thought you might like to let your PITOB folks know that there is a nasty rumor about that alledges that the requisite number of signatures had been collected but PITOB cut a deal at the last minute and did not submit them for a count.  I don't believe it, but there is an element out there that does.   regards,  mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wendell,<br />
     thought you might like to let your PITOB folks know that there is a nasty rumor about that alledges that the requisite number of signatures had been collected but PITOB cut a deal at the last minute and did not submit them for a count.  I don&#8217;t believe it, but there is an element out there that does.   regards,  mike
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.660 seconds -->
